Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Citizen Wells’

Hat tip to Citizen Wells where I found this link!

http://peoplespassions.org/peoplesvoice/Lawsuit_Sam_Reed/Press_Release_08_10_10.htm

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Contact: Steve Marquis
Telephone Number: 425-698-7084
Email Address: peoplesvoice@peoplespassions.org
Web site address:
http://peoplespassions.org/peoplesvoice/peoplesvoice.html

Averting a Crisis in Confidence; Citizen files Lawsuit Against Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed demanding verification of Barack Obama’s citizenship status.

Seattle WA. 10/9/2008 — Steven Marquis, a resident of Fall City WA today filed suit in Washington State Superior Court against Secretary of State Sam Reed demanding verification of Barack Obama’s citizenship status.

The complaint seeks specifically that the office of the Washington Secretary of State verify and certify that Mr. Obama is or is not a “natural born” citizen by producing original or certified verifiable official documents. The lawsuit argues that this certification should take place before the election to preclude a constitutional crisis and likely civil unrest should such certification, after the election, prove that Mr. Obama was not qualified for office.

The Complaint argues that the Secretary of State has the authority and duty to not only certify the voters but also and most importantly the candidates and in so doing prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters who would had had an opportunity to choose from qualified candidates had the certification preceded the election process.

At this point, Mr. Obama has not allowed independent or official access to his birth records nor supporting hospital records. The Hawaii Health Department has violated Federal law by ignoring formal Freedom of Information requests for the same. Due to the facts and numerous other allegations that would challenge Mr. Obama’s fundamental qualifications for office, a Federal lawsuit was filed and is currently being heard in District Court, Pennsylvania.

Mr. Obama failed to respond to the District Court’s request to produce or allow access to the official documents (should they exist) and instead filed a motion to dismiss arguing the Plaintiff had no “standing” or right to know. This non-response as of 9/24/2008 in Federal court casts doubt on the veracity of the electoral system and is the principal reason for this lawsuit. The late entry of this suit is due in principal part to Mr. Obama’s delay and subsequent non response to reasonable request for valid certificates. Multiple requests for early certification to the Office of the Secretary of State has been rejected. 

[clarification: The district court process itself demands a response from Mr. Obama. When a complaint is filed, the defendant has an opportunity to respond to the judge regarding the plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction. Obama did respond, but not with the requested documentation, not even minimally so. He responded with a motion for dismissal based on “standing” rather than the merits of the case]

The Washington Secretary of State Office is specifically charged with certifying and guaranteeing the veracity of official documents and overseeing the elections to wit the people’s confidence in the fundamental aspect of democracy is maintained. To date, in this regard, Secretary of State Sam Reed has not carried out that fundamental duty.

This lawsuit demands injunctive relief directing Sam Reed, Secretary of State, carry out the duty of his office in this regard answering the formal complaints for verification of Mr. Obama and any other candidate appearing on the ballots issues through his office for which formal complaints have been received.

Interested Parties may contact Plaintive as follows:
Contact: Steve Marquis
Telephone Number: 425-698-7084
Email Address:
peoplesvoice@peoplespassions.org
Web site address:
http://peoplespassions.org/peoplesvoice/peoplesvoice.html

 

I don’t know much about this yet but I plan to find out since it’s happening right here in my state. However this is at least the third state to have this type of suit filed besides Phillip Berg’s suit. Eventually even the Obama lovin’ media will have to start reporting this story.

Of course we must ask ourselves is there merit to this case as well as the Berg suit and others? Is Obama eligible to be the President of the United States? I don’t have the answers. I do think America deserves to know and I think Senator Obama should be a man and show the proof one way or the other to show the voters who deserve to know who they are voting for. I’m talking about theactual paper copy of his birth certificate and other documents that have been requested.

We don’t care to see the photo-shopped COLB that is on the Fight the Smears website as it has been proven to be a fake and there is definitely a conflict of interest between the Annenburg owned Fact Check and Senator Obama, who has served on the board of this organization and he was responsible for decisions on funds distributed by this organization.

Americans deserve to know the truth. Does Barrak Obama have the proof that he is eligible? Why doesn’t he just comply with the court and provide the documents?

Oh, and it is not racist to ask a candidate to prove his eligibility it is after all a requirement of law that we are talking about.

Then there is this: Thanks to reader Mabel for the link!

http://africanpress.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/shocking-development-mrs-obama-decides-enough-is-enough-my-husband-was-born-in-hawaii-and-adopted-by-his-step-father-does-that-make-him-unpatriotic-she-asks-on-a-direct-telephone-to-api/

Shocking development: Mrs Obama decides enough is enough: “My husband was born in Hawaii and adopted by his step father, does that make him unpatriotic; she asks”, on a direct telephone to API.

Posted by africanpress on October 15, 2008

Accusing API of colluding with American internet bloggers in an effort to bring down her husband, Mrs Obama said she decided to call API because of what she termed, API’s help to spread rumours created by American bloggers and other racist media outlets in their efforts to damage a black man’s name, saying she hopes African Media was mature enough to be in the front to give unwavering support to her husband, a man Africans should identify themselves with. 

When API told her that our online news media was only relaying what the American Bloggers and other media outlets had discovered through their investigations, Mrs Obama was angered and she came out loud with the following: “African press International is supposed to support Africans and African-American view,” and she went to state that, “it is strange that API has chosen to support the racists against my husband. There is no shame in being adopted by a step father. All dirt has been thrown onto my husband’s face and yet he loves this country. My husband and I know that there is no law that will stop him from becoming the president, just because some American white racists are bringing up the issue of my husband’s adoption by His step father. The important thing here is where my husband’s heart is at the moment. I can tell the American people that My husband loves this country and his adoption never changed his love for this country. He was born in Hawaii, yes, and that gives him all the right to be an American citizen even though he was adopted by a foreigner; says Michelle Obama on telefon to API.”

 

 

 

I have no idea what to think about this. Although I would not find it hard to believe that Michelle’s mouth could get away from her as it has in the past. I have asked for verification as have many others. We will be watching this story. Below is a comment from Phil Berg left at the the site.

Philip J. Berg, Esquire Says:
October 15, 2008 at 5:46 pm

This article confirms what I, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, have been arguing for months for all of the citizens of the United States that Obama is “not” qualified to be President of the United States, as required by our U.S. Constitution!

Our U.S. Constitution states that the “qualifications” for President are: 1) be thirty-five [35] years of age; 2) live in the United States for fourteen [14] years; and 3) be a “natural born” citizen. Obama fulfills the 1st two “qualifications,” but fails in the 3rd.

If Obama’s wife, Michelle’s version is correct, she confirms what I alleged, that Obama was either “adopted” or “acknowledged” by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro. Mrs. Obama states Obama was “adopted.”

The adoption means that when Obama returned to the United States, if he came through U.S. Immigration, Obama would only be “naturalized” and therefore ineligible to be President. If Obama did not go through U.S. Immigration, he would be an illegal alien and therefore not only be ineligible to be President, but also ineligible to be U.S. Senator from Illinois and subject to deportation.

Thank you – Michelle Obama !

 

So interesting that these things just keep popping up. Also interesting is the common reaction by the candidate and his supporters that Obama should not have to answer the question as if he were above the law and some how exempt from scrutiny.

My advice to Obama is this: If you want the voters to give you the highest job in the country then you should at least have enough respect for them to settle this matter and stop trying to circumvent the law.

CQ

 

Read Full Post »

Citizen Wells has a new post with some very revealing information about the vetting process where it concerns elected officials.

We have received a lot of question asking “How did Obama get this far, he must have had background checks as he is a U.S. Senator.”

However, this is inaccurate according to Special Agent-in-Charge: C. Frank Figliuzzi of the Cleveland FBI. Background checks are not performed on those elected, once elected they work for Congress and are handed a secret clearance. See below:

This is a conversation between the Special Agent-in-Charge: C. Frank Figliuzzi of the Cleveland FBI and Mike Trivisonno on the Mike Trivisonno Show, WTAM 1100, 7/02/08, Hr. 2.

Caller – Do they perform background checks on candidates and fellows who are in Congress and the Senate and perhaps potential presidential candidates?.

FBI – The short answer is no, no we don’t, but they’re given top secret clearances because they’re members of Congress, or Senators, or even higher ranking officials.

Host – Time out. There are no background checks from the FBI on the people that lead the country, the United States of America?.

FBI – Let me emphasize, elected officials. This is a democracy, the people have elected an official to represent them in Washington, and we do not routinely run background checks on those people.

Host – Even people running for president of the United States of America?.

FBI – That’s correct.

Host – That’s a little weird

FBI – Well, its part of democracy, its part of what the American people want, they want to be able to vote for somebody to represent them in Washington and they don’t want us to get in the way of that and we have no predilection to get in the way of that.

Host – Yeah, but what if they’re voting for a bad person and they don’t know that person is bad, do you follow me?. I’m saying, if the guy’s got a background and maybe he’s involved with some people that he shouldn’t be involved with, shouldn’t we know that as voters?.

FBI – Well, I think you’d agree that the American political process is about as rigorous as you’ll ever see and if there’s dirt back there, probably the opponent is gonna get it out probably before anyone else will.

Host – Now I know why you’re the head of the FBI, they’re good, aren’t they?.”

Read the whole post for more here.   http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/09/20/philip-j-berg-lawsuit-obamacrimescom-colb-update-comments-insights-fbi-response-special-agent-in-charge-background-checks-elected-officials-american-political-process-berg-website-comments/

Now isn’t that an interesting little tidbit? Nobody does background checks or vetting in an official capacity on elected officials even candidates for President of the United States!

They figure it’s the discretion of the voters and that political campaigns will expose and vet candidates potential problems. In other words the people voted for them it’s up to them to make sure of who and what they really are.

So all the people out there saying the Birth Certificate thing is a non issue because he would have been checked out before running I guess that’s not the case at all. I suppose next they will “justify” why Obama should not have to show proof that he’s eligible for the job.

McCain faced similar questions and had at least the consideration for his supporters, the country and his own reputation to show proof and put the matter to rest. Will Obama do the same? Or will he continue to show us the fake COLB on his website even though it’s been examined and shown to be a forgery. Yet another crime that is going unpunished and “justified”!

 

CQ

Read Full Post »

I guess first the post’s from Techdude & Judah Benjamin on texasdarlin.wordpress.com in regards to the apparently fraudulent Certificate of Live Birth that has been posted on the Fight the Smears site the One set up to supposedly depose his detractors. Interestingly enough this could be much more problematic for the Senator than the original alleged “smears” themselves.

Consider this if the “smears” are indeed proved true then this site they set up to fight them and the “proofs” claimed on it are in fact “smears” themselves. First of all the term “smears” is not by any means a technical or official term. What we are really talking about here cannot be simply brushed off as “smears”. These are misrepresentation of facts and in some cases , such as the COLB if it is in fact proven a forgery, a criminal fraud.

Think about it. I am not an idiot. I know there are people who lie on and off the web every day. I know there are people who lie about others and those who lie about what others have said about them. I also know that if you want to present yourself as honorable, trustworthy and qualified to lead the USA as President you should not lie period. Not about yourself and not about those who accuse you rightfully.

I’m no judge or jury but I know that although there is much argument about the forgery even those who disagree about whether it’s a complete fake or a fake created over an existing erased document seem to be in general agreement that regardless the document in question is indeed a fake. So the question is if he had nothing to hide and these were all “smears” then why did he present a forgery instead of the real document? What are we to think about this in regard to the other “smears” the One is fighting?

Should someone who presents forged documents and fights supposed “smears” with lies be considered qualified, capable or morally acceptable for the office of POTUS? If you want a more in-depth report go to Texas Darlin’s site and explore away!

Next on the agenda the petition to impeach Senator Obama has been gaining signatures and apparently has been amended to add more charges. From what I read on the matter even Kenya has jumped on the bandwagon. They are a bit angry at the Senator for interfering in and speaking out against the then current government and in support of his cousin Railla Odinga. There has been much violence in Kenya since Odinga gained power and the US allied country blames in some ways Barrack Obama for interfering in their government and helping to get this current corrupt government in power. Plus they allege he misused his passport. For a much more detailed report on this check out citizenwells.wordpress.com Wells has more of the actual text and a link to the petition. Here is the post I’m talking about and please if you haven’t yet signed the petition DO SO NOW!

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/impeach-obama-petition-expel-obama-obama-kenya-2006-kenyan-government-protests-abuse-of-power-more-lies-and-deception/#comments

OK now for the next subject at hand. Some of you have been subjected, as have I, to the abuse and malice of The Mitch & Nan Show blog. A blog that’s entire purpose was to harass, intimidate, threaten and stalk Larry Sinclair and anyone who might possibly believe him, post comments to or visit his blogs.

I have written in the past on my blog about larry Sinclair and his claims that he had gay sex and engaged in the use of cocaine with Barrack Obama in 1999. This man has been subjected to all manor of abuse since making this claim and in fact the threats and interference in his life by others from M&N have made many even more convinced that Larry is indeed telling the truth. I don’t know for a fact one way or another. I was not there. The only people who do know for a fact are Larry Sinclair himself, Barrack Obama, the Limo Driver on the and anybody who the Good Senator may have told in order to gain their help with the cover-up.

As I said I do not know for a fact but it’s as obvious as the nose on your face that Obama has NOT SUED  and has not even posted a rebuttal on his Fight the Smears website. If Larry is lying why wouldn’t Obama sue him? If Larry is lying why are people like M&N so intent on shutting him up? To the point they have actually called law enforcement including the FBI to get Larry arrested, they have called the SSA (by their own written admission no less) to try and get his disability payments and medical coverage taken away from him?

Why would these people go to the trouble of orchastrating attacks on his blog hosts again and again to get his blog shut down and then brag in writing on their blog about having done so? M&N calim to be from France but they have been traced to Houston by some with more computer knowledge than me. They and those who post there and harrass from there use programs that mask their IP addresses so figuring out who they are and where they are is difficult at best. Why the ruse? If they are so sure they are right why hide behind a mask?

I’ll tell you why. They don’t want to be traced back because they know some of the things they have been doing are in fact illegal AND they probabaly are under strict orders not to let anyone find out who is really behind them and their agenda. Think about that one for a minute!

Well surprise, surprise what did I see yeaterday? The Mitch & Nan Show blog is shut down! Could it be that the hate and abuse they spew there finally caught up with them and the host actually shut them down?

According to Larry’s site, http://larrysinclair0926.com/ their host, Go Daddy.com, was served with a copyright infringement notice under the DMCA and they have been given notice to remove certain materials from it’s severers which are being used in direct violation of the law. Hmmmm so Go Daddy.com was served and now M&N are shut down. What conclusions can one draw from that bit of information?

I think it’s also important to note that go Daddy.com is also the web host for BarrackObama.com and other pro-Obama blogs some of which may also be involved in this situation. I’ll have to check out some of the opposition blogs and see if there are more of them shut down as a result of this.

All I can say is I won’t miss those assholes and their hate mail one bit. Funny it seemed to stop about the same time as their blog was shut down. Scared?

 

CQ

Read Full Post »

If you have been reading this blog lately or the blogs of Larry Sinclair, Citizen Wells, Zach Jones or many others you already know about this foul site run by this/these person(s) and their vicious cyber attacks on Larry and all who support him or even anyone who dares visit his blogs.

This site claims they are not a pro-Obama site. I don’t know whether or not they are pro-Obama for sure but as far as I can see the entire purpose for their blog seems to be attacking Larry Sinclair and anyone who supports him, visits or comments on his blogs.

 

I see absolutely no posts on that site that are about ANYTHING ELSE. People should really think about that. In fact that alone says that this is a coordinated attack. Same goes for the blogger neonzx. Not one post on his blog that is not all about Larry Sinclair. Hmmmm. I wonder why these folks have such an obsession? Pro-Obama? Anti-Larry? Or maybe it’s the gay thing. That’s probably it. They’re just anti-gay.

 

It makes no difference to me. They are free to have their hateful thoughts. They are not free to attack, harass and infringe upon the rights of others to have their own thoughts or to express them. They claim Larry is a criminal and a scam artist and that all the others they attack are guilty by association. They are not judge and jury however and they do not have the right to do the things they are doing. If Larry is a criminal then it is the job of law enforcement to investigate and prosecute NOT M&N!

 

Larry has been up front and honest about his past. Mitch & Nan are not even up front about who they/he are/is or where they/he are/is. The claim is that they are from France. A whois search shows that whoever they are they re-rout their posts through a bogus network of IP masking. Guess they were worried someone might be able to figure out who and where they are and that they are full of crap! Maybe they don’t want to be tracked back to the real organization behind this crap! Maybe that organization has strict rules about being tied openly with such people?

 

 

 The fact is that even if you don’t believe Larry (I do) the fact that the site has one agenda and the tactics used by them should scare the hell out of everybody! Why did they decide to focus their attention and time on just this one guy and then why extend their hate and attacks to anyone who ever visited or commented on his site?

 

What reason do they have for their BS? They claim they are crusaders for the truth but what crusader would use the methods and malice these people do? Would people seeking truth and justice really commit crimes against innocent people just because they visit or post comments at a blog of someone they hate?

 

Think about it. I think they are dangerous people because I too have had first hand experience with their wrath. They published my real name, email address and IP on their website along with every other person who ever went to Larry’s blog. They have impersonated me on other blogs, message boards and even in professional organizations in my home state! Lucky for me many of these imposters are caught by either me or on-line friends who know better than to attribute the crap they spew to me. We have to look out for each other and alert friends when someone tries this!

 

If we allow this kind of thug mentality to take over it will not be long before we can’t recognize our great country! Whether or not you believe Sinclair is not the question people should ask as much as whether or not he and all Americans have the right to free speech and the right to feel safe when expressing said speech.

 

M&N do not have the right to silence anybody! They may however be given the right to remain silent if they continue their thuggery.

 

CQ

 

 

Read Full Post »