Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Odinga’

Hat tip to Ace over on Uppity’s site. This video is chilling to say the least.

Hmmm! Not long ago I had quite an argument with a friend about how O and his Bots were just the new Natzis and would be carting dissenters off to camps. She said I was “crazy” or “right-wing” that Obama would never. Then we heard about the Missouri Truth Squad and their threats to “go after” anyone daring to air negative ads about The One.

We also talked about Bill Ayers who she fondly called a “distinguished scholar and proffessor who had simply excersised his right to protest an unjust war” as if he were just some guy standing around at rallies with a sign and a megaphone. But as you can see Ayers and his organization The Weather Underground did far more than protesting at some rallies.

It is an undisputed fact that they set bombs and some of those bombs killed people. The Bots have tried saying that they didn’t kill anybody or that Ayers was not personally involved in the instances where people died. Total bullshit! Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dorn were fugitives for a decade and only escaped prison on technicalities. Ayers founded and ran the group.  As such he was responsible for all the bombings and acts of terror carried out by this group!

Bots will also tell you that Ayers and Obama are NOT cnnected other than living in the same neighborhood r that they barely know each other. WRONG! Obama launched his career from Ayers’ living room and They workerd together very closely on the board of the Woods Fund and the Annenburg Challenge during which they funneled money to ACORN, Trinity United Church of Christ and many other radical groups. The main focus was supposedly education but in reality it was to propmote radical change in the public school system in the vien of political and social ideas rather than actual educational goals. Obama wrote a blurb for one of Ayers’ books. They shared an office for a time.

Obama has always looked up to Ayers and has treated him like a mentor. I can see why he doesn’t want us to know that though. Because it looks bad. It looks bad because it IS bad!

The Bots scream “Guilt by association” yet there’s an old, and wise saying. Birds of a feather flock together. All the birds in the flock Obama hangs with seem to be radical extremists and criminals, people who hate the rest of us. I have not yet seen one of his “good friends” that is a credible and decent person. Rezco, Wright, Kahlidi, Auchi, Odinga, Ayers, Farrakkan, Phleger and the list goes on and on and not one of them I would invite over for dinner!

Let’s make this viral. The truth needs to be told loudly to get heard over all the lies and media crap!

Nobama in November! Country 1st!

 

CQ

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

I’m so tired of all the sore loser and bitter dead-ender comments out there. They want to spin this party implosion as being all about Hillary Clinton’s supporters being “spiteful”.

I know you’ve seen it. It’s everywhere. According to these commenters we are voting against Obama only to spite him because he “won” and Hill “lost”. I guess they got tired of calling us racists and republicans. Maybe it was getting old and not sticking. Now they’re on a “spoiled brat, spiteful, sore loser, bitter, old hag” stchick.

When will these people ever figure out that name calling, guilt trips, scare tactics, threats and intimidation is NOT the way to win votes or recruit support? Did they ever hear the phrase “You will catch more flies with honey than vinegar.”? Guess not.

Here’s the truth. Are we pissed off that Hillary Clinton the distinguished Senator from New York, former First lady of the USA and the best candidate to come along in years is not our party’s nominee? Damn right we are! Are we voting against and refusing to support Obama soley because of that anger and dissapointment? Hell NO!

There may be a few Clinton supporters who would disagree with me and say it’s their only reason but truthfully there are very few who feel that way. Sure we’re all bummed but I was bummed when Kerry won the nomination in 2004 as I have been bummed many other times but I still voted for him.

Recently I had some coment made asking me whether I would have voted for George Bush out of spite if it had been Hillary who lost the nomination to Kerry. Answer? NO and Hell NO! He wasn’t my choice and I didn’t like it but I voted for him. Why? I trusted him more than I would ever trust Bush. I didn’t like him that much but he was by far the lesser of two evils in that situation. This is NOT the case in this election cycle. Far from it in fact.

People who try to tell me that Obama’s policies are “nearly identical” might as well save their breath because it’s bullshit. His policies, are a parade of ever changing pandering that even some of my far left friends who supported him are having a hard time keeping up with. Whatever they are today you can rest assured they will be different tomorrow or as soon as it becomes politically expedient that he change them. Again.

Pure and simple, straight from this horse’s mouth, so to speak. We will not vote for him because he is not the right person for the job.  He is not even close. No choice for VP, not even Hillary would have ever made up for that. We don’t think he’s up for the job and more important than that we DO NOT TRUST HIM!

He has proven to be naive at best in his reaction to the current Russia/Georgia conflict as well as incompetent on almost every other major issue. Were he to become the POTUS it is my sincere belief that the country would be in complete economic chaos within the first year of his administration.

Then we have his ideas on foriegn policy (again naive and foolish), National Health Insurance (don’t even get me started on this one) and taxes (raising the Capital Gains Tax has been tried before and proved ineffective and unsucessfull).

The we have the issues of his dangerous associations and all the endorsements from people like Louis Farrakan, NOI, Black Panthers, Hamas, Kim Jong Il, Osama bin Laden. He may not have asked for those endorsments but the fact that people like this support and endorse him is very telling indeed.

Let’s see Rezco (set to be sentenced a week before the November election), Ayers (flag burning, fire bombing, self admitted terrorist who wishes they had done more), Auchi, Odinga, ACORN, Rev. Wright (God Damn America Rev. Wright) and the list goes on and on and on. Why is this guy associated with so many radical, terrorist types? Not to mention convicted criminals. How come they all seem to love Obama so much? Why do they flock to him in droves? You think maybe they recognize a kindred spirit?

To the person or persons who keep sending me comments threatening me and telling me to shut the fuck up: Dream on ! I will not shut up! If it was only that easy! In the words of the famous Tweety Bird “You don’t know me vewy well now do you?” Oh, and BTW, I am self employed so there goes that threat too! Tough day for you huh?

 

CQ

Read Full Post »

Very interesting post on   http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/payoffmedia/ makes one wonder if this is all bought and paid for. As in The One must have the best agent money can buy. Hollywood probably hand picked for him. If anybody knows how to fool the public it’s Hollywood right? It’s not to far a stretch to specualte this after all The One was taking acting lessons from George Clooney too.

Listen I have nothing against Hollywood in general. I like that they produce entertainment even if I don’t like everything produced. I simply excersise my right to free choice and change the channel/DVD/CD or whatever. Problem solved. Crisis averted.  I’m not one  who believes in restricting artists just what I choose to view/hear ect. (I confess I really, really wish the Reality TV folks would just get their own channel so I didn’t have to surf past them but I digress.)

I’m also not one who believes in restricting what news does/does not get reported with a few exceptions for National Security and such. I don’t think it’s smart to report that you are in such and such place with the troops getting ready to attack …or such and such precautions have been taken to prevent access from terrorists. You know I understand we have to censor things like that to protect ourselves but should that extend to protecting political candidates from scandals of their own making? Isn’t that helping to create a false image? Is that even ethical by any standard of journalism?

Yes, I do want to know if someone paid the media to keep the Edwards fiasco under wraps. I want to know if someone is being paid NOT to vet Obama in a serious manner. Are the Media being paid to keep the Larry Sinclair story under wraps? How about the Odinga, Rezco, Auchi and Ayers stories? George Soros’ real connections to Obama and the coup of the Democratic Party? How about ACORN and the falsified voter registration scandal? Um…. the (fake) birth certificate?

We know that the media has colluded with the DNC in protecting The One for their own reasons. The question is what are those reasons and/or are they related in any way to money and/or special considerations?

We know that most of the media refuses to report that the PUMA and JSND movement is real, headed by real democrats who are fed up not closet republicans and that they are gaining any traction. They are for the most part participating in the DNC created myth that the party is unified. Paid for?

How about the latest article from the “Seriously You’re Still Calling Yourselves A News Network?” folks at CNN.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/12/clinton/index.html

But it would be the first time in the modern era of presidential primaries that a losing candidate has so visibly endorsed an opponent so many months before the convention, and then gone on to have his or her name placed in nomination.

According to this phony bit we are supposed to imagine that it is not customary to have a traditional roll call vote at the Democratic Convention. No, of couse it’s not! That’s why it’s always refered to as TRADITIONAL. Because it’s not CUSTOMARY right? Cheeeez and Crackers! Who is paying for this tripe might we ask? Who indeed?

This couldn’t possibly be a smoke screen to hide the fact that The One is afraid, yes VERY AFRAID of his former opponent could it?

CQ

Read Full Post »

I’ve been thinking about this quite a bit lately. No matter who you are or what your reasons are for not supporting the presumptuous (and petulant) nominee if you express them in any way you will automatically be attacked and called all number of vile things and most of them contain the word racist.

You could go on for days about issues, policies, flip-flopping, electability, experience or rather lack thereof, accomplishments (again see lack thereof), Rezco, Wright, Auchi, Odinga, ACORN, and his reluctance, no more like his absolute refusal to answer any hard or meaningful questions as is and should be expected of any other candidate.

Any question that he does not like is met with an immediate charge of racism or McCain surrogacy, if not from The One himself then from someone in his camp. This then becomes a talking point and action plan in the pro-Obama blogisphere where any comment perceived as anti-Obama is gang attacked with similar disdain as if it makes the commenter beneath human merely for making it. Free speech is not something these people take seriously. In their opinion they are free to tell you what to speak.

I’ve decided that since they obviously cannot understand making a decision based on anything other than race that they must then base their own decisions based on race. I mean if that’s the only factor they think we could possibly use for our reasoning it seems they are really the ones who are focused on race.

Yes! I think that must be it! Obama supporters are all racists! They are only voting for him because he’s black! I mean if we are, as they claim, voting on race lines then they must be too! That must be how they know because it takes one to know one right? I mean I’m reasonably sure, make that positive, that they can’t read our minds to actually discern this reasoning.

It’s often said that people hate and go after in others the very thing they dislike about themselves.

Alright I guess that’s enough sarcasm and faulty thinking for one post! Hopefully it illuminates the stupidity and wrong thinking that makes people jump to conclusions without facts to back them up. IE: if you cannot read a person’s mind and see clearly the reasoning and opinions behind their decisions then don’t make judgements based on your own lack of knowledge or your own faulty opinions. Also if they blog or speak out about their decisions and reasoning perhaps you should actually see what they have to say before concluding it is based on race.

Obama supporters I ask you is your vote based on race? Is it or would it be fair to you to assume that it is? Can you not see the faulty logic there? 

The fact is that some people will not vote for him based on race and some people will vote for him for the same reason. I don’t believe for a minute that every voter bases decisions on that. Those that do, wrong as they are, do have a right to vote for or against whoever they want for whatever reason. It’s called the right to vote. It is constitutionally protected.  I don’t like racism or any isms. I don’t have a right to legislate people’s decisions in the voting booth though and neither do The Golden Idiot and his cult-followers. It’s personal choice and as such many personal opinions go into each individual vote. Not legislateable. Also it’s no body’s business unless the voter in question chooses to make it known.

Don’t get me wrong here. I am NOT sticking up for racists on either side of this debate (yes there is racism on BOTH sides). I am simply pointing out that should they chose to vote according to those kinds of narrow minded guidelines they are within their rights to do so. Obama and his supporters have no right to challenge why they vote as they do. Nor do they have a right to challenge why I will not vote for him let alone ignore the reasons I give and replace them with the standard, pat charge of racism.

It is this Thug Mentality that makes me even more determined to keep this arrogant, narcissistic Marxist out of office.He has already joined Dick Cheney and George W Bush in their quest to destroy our civil liberties and assault on our Constitution and according to some of his most ardent supporters we “will all pay a heavy price for daring to speak against Obama”. What’s next? Thought police? The bots already think they can tell what we are thinking next they will try to control our thought processes with mass hypnosis (commonly known as the Kool-Ade)!

I don’t drink Kool-Ade. Thanks but no thanks!

 

CQ

Read Full Post »